Decile Base
Beta
Ctrl + K
Log In Sign Up

Loading...

# AI Toolkit Feedback

0
Community Member
1. What is the difference between the Deal-by-Deal and Whole-of-Fund distribution options, and what does the choice change?

2. Can LPs remove the GP, and how hard is it?

3. Which expenses does the fund bear and which does the GP bear?

4. What does the Advisory Committee actually do, given it owes no fiduciary duties?

5. What happens if an LP fails to fund a capital call?
0 replies
Today
Community Member
Questions and Answers Regarding the Cornerstone LPA

1. What specific documents are included in the Cornerstone download bundle?
Answer: The bundle includes the Cornerstone LPA (v3.0), the Subscription Agreement (investor signature package), the LP Consent Letter, and supporting fund formation documents to provide a complete starting package for counsel.

2. How does Cornerstone reduce fund formation costs and launch timelines?
Answer: By offering a standardized framework developed with fund attorneys, it prevents counsel from drafting an LPA from scratch, lowering legal bills from high five or six figure quotes and shortening LP legal review from weeks to days.

3. Which terms are intended to be customized by the General Partner?
Answer: The GP only edits the fund specific economic variables: fund name, target size, management fee percentage, carried interest, hurdle rate, fund term, and GP commitment. Standard governance mechanics are left unchanged.

4. What distribution waterfalls does Cornerstone v3.0 support?
Answer: Cornerstone v3.0 supports both American (deal by deal) and European (whole of fund) distribution waterfalls, incorporating recent SEC regulatory updates.

5. How should GPs accommodate anchor LPs requesting custom terms without altering the base LPA?
Answer: Anchor LPs negotiate custom arrangements through a separate side letter framework, preserving the core LPA as an unredlined, standardized document that smaller LPs can sign as is.
0 replies
Friday, August 28
Community Member
What can I change without calling an LP vote? Section 8.9 lets me amend non-material, ministerial matters on my own, while any significant change or version upgrade needs a Majority in Interest to approve. 
0 replies
Community Member
Who signs off on a conflict of interest? Section 4.3.3 moved conflict approval from the Advisory Committee to a Majority in Interest of the LPs, and conflicted LPs are excluded from that count. 
0 replies
Thursday, August 27
Community Member
There was an error generating the PACT document for . This error is unexepected, please contact support for help. You can find support at Decile Base, or on Slack.
1 reply
Tuesday, August 25
Tuesday, July 14
Community Member

Missing Feature: Ability to Prevent AI Automation from Editing Custom Data Points

Toolkit: Decile Hub

Category: Missing Feature

Summary: Need ability to prevent AI automation from editing custom data points

Details: User requests the ability to prevent the AI automation assistant from editing or overwriting custom data points in organizations. Currently there is no setting or configuration option to disable AI automation from modifying specific custom fields. This would be valuable for protecting manually-entered or curated data from being altered by automated processes.

This post was automatically created via the Decile AI assistant.
0 replies
Monday, July 13
Community Member
Missing Feature: Public Firm Website Configuration in Decile Hub

Category: Missing Feature
Toolkit: Decile Hub Admin Tools

Issue Summary:
User requested help enabling a public firm website feature in Decile Hub. This is a firm configuration/admin task that requires direct platform access to settings.

Details:
The current toolkit lacks tools to manage firm website settings, branding, or public profile configuration. Users need the ability to:
- Enable/disable public firm website
- Configure firm branding and public profile settings
- Manage firm website visibility and configuration through the AI toolkit

Impact:
Users cannot programmatically configure firm public website settings, requiring manual access to admin panels.

Requested By: Ofer Talmor

This post was automatically created via the Decile AI assistant.
0 replies
Tuesday, July 7
Saturday, June 13
Community Member
Can we publicly raise ? or its must be confidential ?
  @Boris Esanu  
1 reply
Thursday, June 11
Friday, May 29
Community Member
Some of the AI tools present  output in a small box widget that makes it really hard to review and interact with further.   I have to cut and paste it so I can read it which then creates an AI loop back into the widget.   Wondering if that "feature" can be removed for more traditional output.   
0 replies
Wednesday, May 27
Community Member

Summary: Request: Auto-populate prospect pipeline from form submissions

Details: User wants to create a form that prospects can fill out, with the submitted data automatically translating into prospect records in the fundraising pipeline. This would streamline data collection and reduce manual data entry when sourcing LPs.

Toolkit: Decile Hub

Category: missing_feature

Impact: Would significantly reduce manual data entry and improve efficiency in LP sourcing workflows.

This post was automatically created via the Decile AI assistant.
0 replies
Community Member

Missing Feature: Undo Functionality for File/Folder Actions in Decile Hub

Category: Missing Feature

Toolkit: Decile Hub

Summary: User attempted to undo a file or folder action (such as moving a folder) in Decile Hub but there is no available tool or functionality to support this operation.

Details: The user needs the ability to reverse recent file/folder management actions. Currently, there is no undo capability when users accidentally move, delete, or modify files and folders within Decile Hub.

Impact: Users are unable to recover from accidental file/folder management mistakes, requiring manual correction or administrative intervention.

This post was automatically created via the Decile AI assistant.
0 replies
Friday, May 22
Community Member
H-E-B Supplier Diversity engaged Avenida Ventures this week as a possible solution partner for the co-packing and manufacturing infrastructure gap facing San Antonio and Austin's CPG community — before we closed a single investment. Thesis validated. Building the production backbone for veteran-owned and culturally relevant consumer goods innovators across South and Central Texas. Bexar County ED and Prosper West meetings this week. FENIX site selection active. Who else in the cohort is building in food, CPG, or regional infrastructure? Let's connect. 
0 replies

Loading more posts...

Log In or Sign Up

Please Log In, or Sign Up to participate in the discussion.

Log In
or
Sign Up

Apply to VC Lab Cohort 22

Get full access to Decile Base and the Decile Hub venture platform for free by joining the VC Lab program.

Apply to VC Lab Cohort 22

Decile Group Inc. uses cookies for our website to function properly; some are optional and help deliver a personalized and enhanced experience. By clicking "Allow all", you consent to store cookies on your device in accordance with our cookie policy. You can reject all non-essential processing by choosing to accept only necessary cookies. To learn more check Cookie Policy